External peer review of the RT-PCR test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 essential scientific shortcomings on a molecular and methodological level: Consequences for false positive results.
Dear reader, today we will start with a quote from Prof. Albert Einstein, (from a radio broadcast for United Jewish Appeal, April 11, 1943):
"The pursuit of truth and knowledge is one of the most beautiful things that a person is capable of, even if pride in this pursuit is mostly on the lips of those who are least filled with such pursuits."
The world has been with the for almost a year Corona pandemic employed. A great many measures have been taken to control the situation. We at the DTT Science-Tank Team have never addressed the subject of the corona pandemic. The reason is quite simple. In order to form a scientific opinion on a topic, you need a healthy and respectful dispute, especially in science. Good scientists have always done that. If you just look at the history of quantum physics and the various legendary feuds between scientists, you learn how science works. Unfortunately took place in the present Corona crisis Hardly tired of a proper dispute, until now.
It goes without saying that the basis for various measures by governments is the PCR tests represent.
The work published in early 2019: Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR - to be found here (https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045)
Authors:
Victor M Corman, Olfert Landt, Marco Kaiser, Richard Molenkamp4, Adam Meijer, Daniel KW Chu6, Tobias Bleicker1, Sebastian Brünink, Julia Schneider, Marie Luisa Schmidt1, Daphne GJC Mulders4, Bart L Haagmans, Bas van der Veer, Sharon van den Brink , Lisa Wijsman, Gabriel Goderski, Jean-Louis Romette, Joanna Ellis, Maria Zambon, Malik Peiris, Herman Goossens, Chantal Reusken, Marion PG Koopmans, Christian Drosten
is known. It was and is perhaps still considered the main trigger for the implementation of PCR tests.
Without going into the details of the work, we'd like to go into one Review report to draw attention:
Image source: Pixabay
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results - to be found here (https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/)
Autoren:
Pieter Borger, Bobby Rajesh Malhotra, Michael Yeadon, Clare Crai, Kevin McKernan, Klaus Steger, Paul McSheehy, Lidiya Angelova, Fabio Franchi, Thomas Binder, Henrik Ullrich, Makoto Ohashi, Stefano Scoglio, Marjolein Doesburg-van Kleffens, Dorothea Gilbert, Rainer Klement, Ruth Schruefer, Berber W Pieksma, Jan Bonte, Bruno H Dalle Carbonare, Kevin P Corbett, Ulrike Kämmerer